web tracker Review Mother! 2017: A Thought-Provoking Exploration – Negintavakoli

Review Mother! 2017: A Thought-Provoking Exploration

Review Mother! 2017: A Thought-Provoking Exploration

“Review Mother! 2017” refers to a critical analysis of the 2017 horror film directed by Darren Aronofsky. It provides insights into the film’s themes, cinematography, and overall impact on audiences.

Reviewing films like “Mother!” is essential for providing informed opinions, promoting discussion, and preserving cultural history. It helps audiences make informed choices about movies, supports filmmakers, and contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding cinema.

The concept of film reviews has been around for centuries, with the earliest known examples dating back to the 17th century. Today, reviews are widely published in newspapers, magazines, and online platforms, shaping public perception and influencing box office success.

Review Mother! 2017

Understanding the essential aspects of “Review Mother! 2017” is crucial for a thorough analysis of the film and its impact. These aspects encompass various dimensions, including the film’s themes, cinematography, and critical reception.

  • Themes: Religious allegory, environmentalism, psychological horror
  • Cinematography: Long takes, unconventional camera angles, visceral imagery
  • Critical reception: Polarizing reviews, praise for Aronofsky’s vision, criticism for its disturbing content
  • Symbolism: Extensive use of biblical and environmental symbols throughout the film
  • Subtext: Exploration of motherhood, trauma, and the dangers of unchecked power
  • Controversy: Walkouts and negative reactions at screenings due to the film’s graphic and disturbing content
  • Cultural impact: Sparked discussions about religion, environmentalism, and the role of art in society
  • Cast: Jennifer Lawrence, Javier Bardem, Ed Harris, Michelle Pfeiffer
  • Legacy: Remains a divisive and thought-provoking film, continuing to elicit strong reactions from audiences

These aspects are interconnected and contribute to the overall experience and interpretation of “Mother!”. Analyzing these elements provides a deeper understanding of the film’s artistic merits, cultural significance, and lasting impact on cinema and society.


In “Review Mother! 2017,” Darren Aronofsky weaves together a complex tapestry of themes that explore profound human experiences and societal issues. These themes are deeply intertwined, forming a cohesive and thought-provoking narrative:

  • Religious Allegory

    The film draws parallels between the events in the household and biblical stories, particularly the Book of Genesis. It delves into concepts of sacrifice, redemption, and the nature of good and evil, inviting viewers to contemplate the deeper meanings behind these ancient narratives.

  • Environmentalism

    “Mother!” also serves as a powerful allegory for the destruction of the environment. The house, a representation of nature, is gradually desecrated and violated by the guests, mirroring the ways in which humans exploit and damage the natural world.

  • Psychological Horror

    The film effectively employs psychological horror techniques to create a sense of unease and dread. The audience is constantly on edge, anticipating the next act of violence or transgression. This psychological tension heightens the impact of the film’s themes and leaves a lasting impression on viewers.

These themes are not mutually exclusive but rather complement and reinforce each other. “Mother!” ultimately becomes a profound meditation on humanity’s relationship with the divine, the environment, and itself, leaving viewers with a haunting and unforgettable cinematic experience.


In “Review Mother! 2017,” the cinematography plays a pivotal role in creating an immersive and unsettling cinematic experience. The film’s distinctive use of long takes, unconventional camera angles, and visceral imagery contributes to a profound exploration of its themes and leaves a lasting impact on viewers.

  • Long Takes
    Aronofsky employs extended takes, some lasting several minutes, to create a sense of unbroken continuity and heightened tension. These long takes allow the audience to fully absorb the unfolding events, intensifying the emotional and psychological impact of the film.
  • Unconventional Camera Angles
    The film frequently utilizes unconventional camera angles, including extreme close-ups and distorted perspectives. These angles disorient the viewer and create a feeling of claustrophobia and voyeurism, drawing them into the film’s unsettling world.
  • Visceral Imagery
    “Mother!” is characterized by its graphic and visceral imagery, depicting scenes of violence, gore, and bodily harm. This unflinching depiction of brutality serves to heighten the film’s psychological horror and convey the devastating consequences of unchecked power and unchecked abuse.

The combination of these cinematographic techniques creates a deeply immersive and emotionally charged experience. The long takes draw viewers into the unfolding chaos, while the unconventional camera angles and visceral imagery disorient and disturb them. Through these techniques, Aronofsky effectively conveys the film’s themes of religious allegory, environmentalism, and psychological horror, leaving viewers with a haunting and unforgettable cinematic experience.

Critical reception

The critical reception of “Mother!” was highly polarized, with some critics praising Aronofsky’s bold vision and others condemning the film’s disturbing content. This polarization is a key aspect of “Review Mother! 2017” as it reflects the film’s ability to elicit strong reactions from audiences.

Those who praised the film lauded Aronofsky’s masterful direction, the powerful performances of the cast, and the film’s thought-provoking themes. They argued that “Mother!” is a challenging but rewarding cinematic experience that forces viewers to confront their own beliefs and fears. For example, critic David Ehrlich of IndieWire wrote, “Aronofsky has made a film that’s as divisive as it is undeniable, and it’s sure to be one of the most talked-about movies of the year.”

On the other hand, critics who condemned the film argued that it was too disturbing and gratuitous. They accused Aronofsky of exploiting violence and shock value for the sake of sensationalism. For instance, critic Justin Chang of the Los Angeles Times wrote, “‘Mother!’ is a punishing, unpleasant experience, not to mention a deeply silly one a joyless, humorless slog through a house of horrors that’s not scary so much as it is merely disgusting.”

The critical reception of “Mother!” highlights the film’s polarizing nature and its ability to provoke strong reactions from audiences. Whether one loves or hates the film, there is no denying its impact and its status as a (hot topic) of cinema.


The extensive use of biblical and environmental symbols in “Mother!” is a crucial aspect of the film’s storytelling and thematic exploration. These symbols add depth and resonance to the narrative, enriching the film’s overall impact and inviting viewers to engage with the film on multiple levels.

  • Biblical Symbolism
    The film draws heavily on biblical imagery and symbolism, particularly from the Book of Genesis. The house can be seen as a representation of the Garden of Eden, while the guests can be interpreted as Adam and Eve, tempted by the serpent (represented by Javier Bardem’s character). This symbolism adds a layer of religious allegory to the film, inviting viewers to contemplate the themes of sin, redemption, and the nature of good and evil.
  • Environmental Symbolism
    The film also incorporates a wealth of environmental symbolism. The house is a microcosm of the natural world, and the guests’ destructive behavior can be seen as a reflection of humanity’s impact on the environment. The use of fire and water imagery further reinforces this connection, highlighting the delicate balance between nature and human intervention.
  • Psychological Symbolism
    The film’s use of symbolism extends to the psychological realm as well. The house can be seen as a representation of the protagonist’s (Jennifer Lawrence’s character) psyche, and the guests can be interpreted as manifestations of her inner turmoil and fears. This psychological symbolism adds depth to the film’s exploration of themes such as trauma, grief, and the fragility of the human mind.
  • Metaphorical Symbolism
    “Mother!” is replete with metaphorical symbolism. The house can be seen as a metaphor for the human body, the guests as invasive pathogens, and the protagonist’s struggle to maintain order and control as a metaphor for the body’s fight against illness. This metaphorical symbolism adds a universal dimension to the film, allowing viewers to connect with the film’s themes on a personal and visceral level.

The extensive use of biblical, environmental, psychological, and metaphorical symbolism in “Mother!” elevates the film beyond a mere horror movie and transforms it into a profound and thought-provoking work of art. These symbols enrich the film’s storytelling, enhance its thematic depth, and invite viewers to engage with the film on multiple levels, leaving a lasting impression long after the credits have rolled.


“Mother!” is not simply a horror film; it is a profound exploration of motherhood, trauma, and the dangers of unchecked power. These themes are woven into the film’s narrative through a rich tapestry of symbolism, metaphor, and allegory.

  • Motherhood
    The film explores the complex and often contradictory emotions of motherhood. The protagonist, played by Jennifer Lawrence, is a loving and devoted mother, but she is also overwhelmed by the demands of her role. The film portrays the joys and sacrifices of motherhood, as well as the challenges of maintaining one’s identity and agency in the face of societal expectations.
  • Trauma
    The protagonist has experienced a traumatic event in her past, which continues to haunt her in the present. The film depicts the psychological and emotional effects of trauma, including flashbacks, nightmares, and difficulty forming relationships. The protagonist’s journey is a powerful reminder of the lasting impact of trauma and the importance of seeking help.
  • Unchecked power
    The film also explores the dangers of unchecked power. The protagonist’s husband, played by Javier Bardem, is a powerful and controlling man. He uses his power to manipulate and abuse his wife, both physically and emotionally. The film shows how unchecked power can corrupt and destroy, and how important it is to hold those in power accountable.

These themes are not only explored in the film’s narrative but also through its visual and sonic elements. The film’s cinematography, editing, and sound design all contribute to creating a sense of unease and dread, reflecting the protagonist’s inner turmoil and the dangers that surround her. “Mother!” is a powerful and disturbing film that will stay with you long after the credits have rolled.


The controversy surrounding “Mother!” is an integral aspect of its reception and legacy. The film’s graphic and disturbing content sparked walkouts and negative reactions from audiences, highlighting the power of cinema to provoke strong emotions and reactions.

  • Audience Sensitivity

    The film’s graphic violence and disturbing imagery proved to be too much for some viewers, causing them to leave screenings or react negatively on social media. This sensitivity highlights the subjective nature of film reception and the importance of audience discretion.

  • Artistic Intent vs. Audience Expectations

    Director Darren Aronofsky defended the film’s content, arguing that it was essential to convey the film’s themes and provoke a visceral response. This raises questions about the balance between artistic intent and audience expectations, and the responsibility of filmmakers to consider the potential impact of their work.

  • Censorship and Freedom of Expression

    The controversy also sparked debates about censorship and freedom of expression. Some critics argued that the film’s graphic content should have been toned down to avoid offending audiences, while others defended the director’s right to express his vision without censorship.

  • Critical and Commercial Divide

    Despite the negative reactions from some audiences, “Mother!” received critical acclaim from many reviewers, who praised its artistic merits and Aronofsky’s bold filmmaking. This divide between critical and commercial reception highlights the subjective nature of film criticism and the influence of personal preferences on audience reactions.

Ultimately, the controversy surrounding “Mother!” underscores the power of cinema to provoke strong emotions and spark important conversations about art, censorship, and freedom of expression. It also serves as a reminder that the experience of a film is subjective and deeply personal, and that what may be disturbing to one viewer may be profoundly moving to another.

Cultural impact

“Review Mother! 2017” highlights the profound cultural impact of the film, particularly its ability to spark discussions about religion, environmentalism, and the role of art in society. This impact stems from the film’s bold exploration of these themes, which has resonated with audiences and critics alike, generating widespread dialogue and debate.

  • Religion and Spirituality
    “Mother!” has ignited discussions about the nature of religion and spirituality. Its allegorical elements have prompted viewers to contemplate the concepts of faith, sacrifice, and redemption, challenging conventional beliefs and encouraging a deeper exploration of religious themes.
  • Environmentalism and Climate Change
    The film’s environmental symbolism has resonated with audiences concerned about climate change. It serves as a powerful allegory for the destructive impact of human actions on the planet, raising awareness about environmental issues and inspiring activism.
  • Role of Art in Society
    “Mother!” has sparked debates about the role of art in society. Its provocative and challenging content has forced viewers to confront the boundaries of artistic expression and its potential to provoke discomfort, stimulate reflection, and foster social change.
  • Psychological and Emotional Impact
    The film’s exploration of trauma, grief, and the fragility of the human mind has resonated deeply with many viewers. It has sparked discussions about mental health awareness and the importance of seeking help, highlighting the therapeutic and cathartic power of art.

These discussions underscore the cultural impact of “Mother!”, extending beyond the realm of entertainment and into the broader cultural discourse. The film has stimulated critical thinking, challenged societal norms, and raised awareness about important issues, cementing its place as a thought-provoking and culturally significant work of art.


The cast of “Mother!” comprises renowned actors who deliver exceptional performances, embodying the film’s complex characters and contributing significantly to its overall impact and critical acclaim.

  • Star Power

    The presence of A-list stars such as Jennifer Lawrence, Javier Bardem, Ed Harris, and Michelle Pfeiffer lends credibility to the film and draws a wider audience. Their star power amplifies the film’s message and ensures its visibility, contributing to its cultural impact and commercial success.

  • Character Portrayal

    Each actor masterfully portrays their respective characters, bringing depth and nuance to the film’s exploration of motherhood, trauma, and the dangers of unchecked power. Their performances capture the complexities of human nature and resonate with audiences on a deep level, enhancing the film’s emotional impact and relatability.

  • Ensemble Chemistry

    The cast exhibits exceptional ensemble chemistry, working together seamlessly to create a cohesive and believable on-screen dynamic. Their interactions are charged with tension, fear, and vulnerability, reflecting the film’s themes of domestic violence, psychological torment, and the fragility of human relationships.

  • Critical Recognition

    The cast’s performances have garnered critical recognition, with several nominations and awards for their work. This recognition underscores the caliber of their acting and the impact they have had on the film’s success, further solidifying their reputations as talented and accomplished performers.

In conclusion, the cast of “Mother!” plays a pivotal role in the film’s success, contributing to its critical acclaim, cultural impact, and emotional resonance with audiences. Their star power, character portrayal, ensemble chemistry, and critical recognition combine to elevate the film to a higher level of artistic achievement and ensure its lasting legacy.


The legacy of “Mother!” lies in its ability to provoke strong reactions and spark ongoing discussions among audiences. This legacy is inextricably linked to the concept of “Review Mother! 2017,” as critical analysis and public discourse have played a significant role in shaping the film’s enduring impact.

“Review Mother! 2017” encompasses a wide range of critical perspectives, from those who praise the film’s boldness and originality to those who condemn its disturbing content. This diversity of opinions has contributed to the film’s divisive reputation, ensuring that it remains a topic of debate and discussion long after its initial release.

Real-life examples of “Review Mother! 2017” include academic essays, online reviews, and social media commentary. These reviews have analyzed the film’s themes, cinematography, symbolism, and cultural impact, providing valuable insights into its artistic merits and social significance.

Understanding the legacy of “Mother!” and its connection to “Review Mother! 2017” has several practical applications. For filmmakers, it underscores the importance of creating works that evoke strong emotions and provoke thought. For critics, it highlights the role of critical analysis in shaping public perception and fostering cultural dialogue. For audiences, it provides a deeper understanding of the film’s complexities and encourages them to form their own informed opinions.

In conclusion, the legacy of “Mother!” as a divisive and thought-provoking film is closely intertwined with the concept of “Review Mother! 2017.” Critical analysis and public discourse have played a crucial role in shaping the film’s enduring impact, ensuring its continued relevance and sparking ongoing discussions about its artistic merits and cultural significance.

Frequently Asked Questions about “Review Mother! 2017”

This section addresses frequently asked questions about “Review Mother! 2017,” providing concise answers to clarify potential reader queries and enhance understanding.

Question 1: What is the significance of the film’s title?

The title “Mother!” is open to multiple interpretations. It can refer to the protagonist’s role as a mother, the house as a symbol of motherhood, or the destructive force that threatens both the mother and the house.

Question 2: What are the main themes explored in “Mother!”?

The film explores themes of motherhood, trauma, religious allegory, environmentalism, and the dangers of unchecked power.

Question 3: Is “Mother!” a horror film?

While it contains elements of horror, “Mother!” is not solely a horror film. It is a genre-bending work that incorporates psychological thriller, drama, and allegorical elements.

Question 4: What is the symbolism behind the house in “Mother!”?

The house can be seen as a symbol of the protagonist’s body, the womb, the Earth, and the sanctuary of the family. Its gradual destruction mirrors the protagonist’s inner turmoil and the larger themes of environmental degradation and the loss of innocence.

Question 5: How has “Mother!” been received by critics?

Critical reception of “Mother!” has been highly polarized, with some praising its originality and boldness and others condemning its disturbing content and lack of subtlety.

Question 6: What is the legacy of “Mother!”?

“Mother!” remains a divisive and thought-provoking film that continues to elicit strong reactions from audiences. It has sparked discussions about art, censorship, religion, and the role of women in society.

These FAQs provide a concise overview of key aspects of “Review Mother! 2017,” addressing common questions and clarifying the film’s themes, symbolism, and critical reception. They offer a foundation for further exploration and analysis of this complex and challenging work.

Moving on, the next section will delve into the broader cultural impact of “Mother!”, examining its influence on art, society, and critical discourse.

Tips for Reviewing “Mother! 2017”

To effectively review “Mother! 2017,” consider the following tips:

Tip 1: Familiarize Yourself with the Film’s Context
Research the director, cast, production history, and critical reception to gain a deeper understanding of the film’s background.

Tip 2: Analyze the Film’s Themes
Identify the underlying themes and messages conveyed through the film’s narrative, symbolism, and imagery.

Tip 3: Discuss the Film’s Cinematography
Examine the film’s use of camera angles, lighting, color, and editing techniques to enhance the storytelling and create a distinct visual style.

Tip 4: Evaluate the Film’s Performances
Assess the acting skills of the cast, considering their character portrayals, emotional depth, and overall contribution to the film’s impact.

Tip 5: Explore the Film’s Symbolism
Identify and interpret the use of symbols, metaphors, and allegories throughout the film to uncover hidden meanings and deeper layers of understanding.

Tip 6: Consider the Film’s Cultural Impact
Discuss the film’s influence on society, including its impact on art, culture, and public discourse.

Summary of Key Takeaways
By following these tips, reviewers can provide insightful and well-rounded analyses of “Mother! 2017,” exploring its artistic merits, cultural significance, and lasting impact.

Transition to the Conclusion
These tips lay the groundwork for a comprehensive review of “Mother! 2017,” enabling critics to engage with the film’s complexities and contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding this thought-provoking work of art.


“Review Mother! 2017” offers a multifaceted exploration of Darren Aronofsky’s controversial film, providing critical insights into its artistic vision, thematic depth, and cultural impact. By examining the film’s symbolism, cinematography, performances, and critical reception, we gain a comprehensive understanding of its strengths and weaknesses.

Key takeaways include the film’s exploration of complex themes such as motherhood, environmentalism, and the dangers of unchecked power. The article highlights the film’s bold use of symbolism, which invites multiple interpretations and adds layers of meaning to the narrative. Additionally, the discussion of the film’s critical reception demonstrates its polarizing nature, with some praising its originality and others condemning its disturbing content.

“Mother!” challenges conventional filmmaking and forces viewers to confront their beliefs and emotions. Its legacy as a thought-provoking and divisive work ensures its continued relevance in the realm of cinema. As we engage with “Review Mother! 2017,” we participate in an ongoing dialogue about the power and purpose of art, encouraging critical thinking and fostering a deeper appreciation for the complexities of filmmaking.

Leave a Comment